No. Physical games are not better.

Have u ever noticed how physical gamers always feel the need to say that physical games are superior to digital games? They don't just stop at saying that their personal, subjective preference is for physical games; no. They must take that extra step, make a judgment, and proclaim that physical games are better, implying that they are objectively so. Isn't that asinine? Shouldn't they just stop at expressing their opinions? Why must they take that asinine next step and try to imply that their opinions are facts?

I must surmise that one of these reasons is that they are stupider, and thus, more prone to irrational affirmations. They are like racists or sexists. There is no race or sex that is better than another; they are just different, but the same. Racists and sexists, on the other hand, hold an obstinate belief, that a race or sex is objectively inferior or superior to another. Yes; people who say that physical games are better are operating from the same level of intelligence as racists and sexists.

People who proudly say that they are part of the "PC Master Race" also belong into the category comprised of physical-game evangelists, racists, and sexists. These PC-benchmarkers are always saying that PC is better. No. There are pros and cons to PC-gaming as well. It's not holistically better.

Digital gamers never say that digital games are better, because we know that there are pros and cons to both digital games and physical games. One is not completely better than the other.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

White Japanese Sega Saturn 3D Control Pad (Controller) Review HSS-0137

"Retrotek SCART to Component Converter" Review (SCBV1P3)

Japanese Model 2 Sega Saturn Controller Review HSS-0101