Posts

Showing posts from February, 2017

Videogames won't become mainstream until there are fewer hardware-gates

Much of this is common sense, but it is worth reiterating. What is the biggest obstacle to videogames becoming mainstream? Cost. To play anything, from a mobile game to a AAA title, one needs an electronic device (hardware) to play the game (software). Not only is the hardware expensive, but it is a hassle to have to buy, and there are too many choices. Back when Nintendo reigned supreme, part of the reason was that there weren't many choices, at least in US. Sega Master System was a tiny blip on the radar; the NES owned the market. Nowadays, there are countless different smartphone-manufacturers, tablets, PCs, and the three traditional console-manufacturers: Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft. To watch a movie, you only need money. You pay money for a ticket, and then sit down and watch. Let's round up and say a ticket is $15. To read a book, it's the same thing. You pay money for a book, and then you can read it. Let's say a paperback novel is $10. Let's say

Videogames are art

Image
Contrary to the opinion of a popular, deceased film-critic, videogames are art, and thus should not be judged purely from a left-brained, mathematical perspective. This left-brained thinking seeped into even the development-side of things, especially in the last generation. When viewed solely as products, many developers and publishers rushed to include features from competing games, just for the sake of competition. For example, the Tomb Raider reboot included unnecessary multiplayer. Why? To discourage people from trading it in to Gamestop or selling it, and to check-off a box which increasing amounts of companies sought to check off, which was including online multiplayer modes for the sake of them. This capitalistic scramble to 'keep up' has increased the production-costs of games, but they have not necessarily benefited the gamer nor the evolution or amelioration of gameplay as a whole. Because developers constantly look at other games and copy them, many games, es

"Retrotek SCART to Component Converter" Review (SCBV1P3)

Image
I do not like spreading negativity out there, but I needed to warn people about this device. I bought this for 80 dollars on ebay; I'm not gonna link from whom, because he or she does not deserve more sales of this awful device. When it works, it works, albeit with flaws. The image produced is sharp, as a component-video signal should be, and the colors are accurate, except that there is a green tint to the entire picture. I've read that one has to open these things up and adjust the 'pots' inside (an electrical term) with a screwdriver. I never really tried doing that or minded the green tint too much, because it's very subtle. What I did mind a lot, was the fact that sometimes, it won't work, and I'll only get audio. This is a big problem. I wouldn't mind the colors being a little off, or there being some 'noise' in the video-signal, but when the success-rate of the thing actually working is 50%, it's a deal-breaker. I paid 80 dolla

Shining Force III Scenario 1 Review (No Spoilers) on the Sega Saturn

Image
Yesterday night, I finished Shining Force III on the US Sega Saturn. I played a patched version of the North American release by The Shining Force III Translation Project . Apparently, Sega changed the game knowing that they wouldn't release the other two scenarios. This patched version, apparently, undoes those changes. I really dig the PS1/Saturn/N64 era of games. It's when hardware-accelerated 3D became mainstream, and sprite-based graphics really started to look gorgeous. Shining Force III, like many games of its time, combined 2D sprites on 3D backgrounds to great effect. You kept the aesthetic appeal and detail of 2D sprites with the immersive effect of rotatable 3D backgrounds. The credits of the game credit Camelot and Sonic Co. Ltd. for developing the game. Camelot began using prerendered sprites around that time (think Donkey Kong Country). A more well-known example - Golden Sun on Game Boy Advance, used the same method we saw in SFIII. It looks good, especially

White Japanese Sega Saturn 3D Control Pad (Controller) Review HSS-0137

Image
As a recently new Sega Saturn owner, I knew I had to get the Sega Saturn 3D Control Pad because it was the definitive controller for playing Nights Into Dreams. I decided to purchase the more aesthetically-pleasing Japanese version. Upon first inspection, it is noticeably big - bigger than it should be. Sega was probably going for form over function here, because the round shape does look like a mini-spaceship or UFO, which goes with their theme of space with the Saturn itself, but it is not the most ergonomically comfortable controller out there. For example, when playing six-button fighting-games, it is difficult to hold the controller in the left hand and 'piano' the buttons with the right. The d-pad is a little different from the American Model 1 and Japanese Model 2 controllers'. It feels a little stiffer. Of the three controllers I have tried, it has my least favorite d-pad. On the plus-side, however, it features the best start-button of the three.

The flawed 'blue ocean' strategy

Satoru Iwata and Nintendo achieved great success with DS and Wii using a blue-ocean strategy of developing and catering a product to a greater audience. The blue-ocean strategy, therefore, can work, when done right. The problem is doing it right. The blue-ocean strategy caters to the sheeplike mentality of the majority of the populace, and like ruminants, they will move on to greener pastures; they won't stick around for Wii 2 - that's what the hardcore fanbase is for. Nintendo incorrectly assumed that the sheep they attracted would stick around for Wii U. I can't think of another form of entertainment that purposefully tries to cater to audiences outside its core demographic. Does InStyle magazine try to branch out and attract male readers? Does The View try to appeal to male viewers? Does the NBA try to appeal to females? The answer is no to all of the above, yet they probably have a viewerbase that is diverse in number, if not percentage. Why? It's because the

Japanese Model 2 Sega Saturn Controller Review HSS-0101

Image
Recently, I bought a Model 2 American Sega Saturn, but it came with a Model 1 controller. It was pretty good, but I liked the look of the Model 2 Japanese controller, and the d-pad seemed more comfortable. After ordering one on ebay, and opening the package I later received, I was taken aback at how 'creamy' the controller looked. It didn't look like it had changed color, like old NESes, but it didn't look as white as I had imagined. Even the photo above looks whiter than it actually is. The d-pad is better than the Model 1's, but not by too much. The face-buttons feel the same, but the Start-button is a big improvement. The biggest improvement comes in the form of the shoulder-buttons. I don't think the actual internal switches have changed, but now you don't have to press the buttons on the rear of its plastic-shell to get them to actuate. In general, they feel and sound like mouse-buttons. You won't want to use them in action-games, but f

The hypocritical nature of the Western independence-paradigm

For those of us in the Western, capitalistic world, it's a taboo to live with our parents when we're adults. They say it's to promote 'independence,' but is it really? When people move out of their parents' house, they are still dependent on the system, and on other people. Their bosses become their new parents; their coworkers become their new siblings. This is not true independence. I'm not saying it's bad to be dependent. On the contrary. I believe a certain amount of dependence, or more specifically, harmony, is necessary and healthy in a peaceful society. My point is that we shouldn't look down upon those living with their parents. It's an immature reaction, and highly hypocritical. The great, peaceful societies of the past all intermixed people of all ages and generations together. They enriched each others' lives, and taught each other lessons that could not be taught or learned living alone in a single-bedroom apartment. Let

The selective stinginess of gamers

In general, it seems like PC-gamers are more than willing to spend on hardware, but not as much on software. Conversely, console-gamers are more than willing to spend on games, but not as much on hardware. I see it all the time. PC-gamers spend hundreds of dollars on a single video-card, a hundred-dollars or more each on headsets, mice, and keyboards; but when it comes to games, they will wait for the Steam-sale. Console-gamers love to buy physical, special editions of games they sometimes play for an hour and then shelve. They routinely buy expensive physical games, but scoff at the idea of purchasing digital copies of games, even if it's cheaper. One of the latest developments in the stingy console-gaming landscape is the Nintendo Switch. People are crying about how expensive the accessories are, like the JoyCons and the Pro Controller. They are also crying about how expensive the console itself is. If we can group all gamers together, it's amazing how one group of peo

Tesoro Gram Spectrum Keyboard Review

Image
This 'review' will be covering the White variant with Agile Blue Mechanical Switches, and I won't be going into technical depth, just how I personally feel about this. When I first opened the box that contained the actual OEM-box for the keyboard itself, my heart dropped because on the box was a picture of a black keyboard. Fortunately, I could breathe a sigh of relief when I opened it to find the white keyboard I had purchased. One of the first things I noticed was how heavy the keyboard was. This is by far the heaviest keyboard I have ever owned, and that's a good thing. It probably means it's high-quality. Another thing that delighted me was the USB-cable. It is the best braided cable I have ever laid my hands on. It's thick, soft, light, and bends fairly easily. The Tesoro Gram Spectrum (TSG) is my first foray into mechanical keyboards, if you don't include the old keyboards from the '90s, and I love it. I picked it because

WoW Token for Battle.net Balance is a bad idea

Image
You can now use World of Warcraft Tokens to buy Battle.net Balance (BnB), usable in other Blizzard-games. This was a bad idea. WoW-Tokens were a way to cut off the gold-farmers. People would begin by buying a token from Blizzard using real money. It would automatically be placed in the marketplace. Then, WoW-players who wanted some game-time without paying real-life subscription-fees could buy the token with in-game gold. The person who bought the token with real money would then receive the gold. The price of the tokens were automatically regulated by Blizzard's own script, lowering and raising the price with whatever algorithm was in place. Now, because one can choose instead to get BnB instead of gold in WoW, the market is going haywire. Token-prices are through the roof. This is not a balanced way to do things. You can get stuff with BnB in games like Hearthstone and Overwatch, but you can't buy tokens using in-game currency in those games - only World of Warcraft

Announcing DLC before a game's release is foolish.

Extend your journey into Hyrule with The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Expansion Pass. pic.twitter.com/zaBnugoFo8 — Nintendo of America (@NintendoAmerica) February 14, 2017 On February 14th, 2017, Nintendo announced their DLC-plans for Breath of the Wild. The game launches on March 3rd. Why would they do this? It makes no sense. It doesn't make early-adopters feel any better. "Yay. I'm getting this game on Day 1. Oh wait. I can't get the full experience unless I pay 20 more dollars." So that's $80 for the full game. You know, I wouldn't be so peeved if they announced this after the game came out. Wouldn't it be great if people had been playing the game for a few months, beaten it, explored the crap out of it, all the while enjoying every minute of it. Guess what, playas? New content! DLC! That's when you announce DLC. Not before the game comes out. It's gonna rub people the wrong way. It reminds me of what Keiji Inafune did by

The dark side of love. The term "overrated" is overused and childish.

I'm not saying that I believe this, but if the world is balanced, then the love of something will inspire an equal and opposite hate. In the world of videogames, if a game is lauded and loved by many, there will be many people mystified by its success and ready to spew hateful vitriol at it. In the rap-world, these people are called 'player-haters.' In the world of internet-videogame-commentary, one of the most common retorts to such lofty games is that they are "overrated." I disagree. To call a game like The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time overrated doesn't make one look smart or superior to others. It makes one look childish and ignorant. Why do people call things overrated? The reasons are fear of what they do not know; ignorance of what makes the object-in-question so great; and a subconscious but desperate cry for attention. My sister is a player-hater. Before she even tried a Wii, she was hating on it so hard, it was painful. I can see her p