Announcing DLC before a game's release is foolish.


On February 14th, 2017, Nintendo announced their DLC-plans for Breath of the Wild. The game launches on March 3rd.

Why would they do this? It makes no sense.

It doesn't make early-adopters feel any better. "Yay. I'm getting this game on Day 1. Oh wait. I can't get the full experience unless I pay 20 more dollars." So that's $80 for the full game.

You know, I wouldn't be so peeved if they announced this after the game came out. Wouldn't it be great if people had been playing the game for a few months, beaten it, explored the crap out of it, all the while enjoying every minute of it. Guess what, playas? New content! DLC! That's when you announce DLC. Not before the game comes out. It's gonna rub people the wrong way. It reminds me of what Keiji Inafune did by launching the Kickstarter for Red Ash way before Mighty No. 9 came out.

There are Nintendo-apologists who are claiming that this 'content' is being worked on after the development of the main game. That is a nice claim, but one without proof. Even if it were true, there is no point in announcing DLC before the game comes out. "Here guys. Have this game. Oh, but if you want everything, you're going to have to pay 20 more dollars. Sorry." It doesn't make early-adopters feel good. It doesn't make 'beating' the game any fun, because, oops, there will be more 'content' later on. What would be the point of playing an incomplete game. I'm not saying the game is 'unbeatable' out of the box, but this is a general problem I have with DLC.

When Mass Effect 2 came out, I beat it, but then DLC came out. So I basically went back in time to play through events that I had not gone through during my first playthrough. What's the point in beating a game, just to have to go through it again, or play a few missions out of order? It breaks the narrative flow and feels tacky.

Of course, it's all about money. Development-costs are astronomical and companies need to recoup them, but this is not the way.

DLC is okay when 1) it's timed right, 2) it's inexpensive or free, or 3) it's substantial. Splatoon got free DLC for months; that was awesome. But that was a multiplayer-focused game. With a story-based game like Zelda, I'm personally not gonna want to go back to it months after release to play one new dungeon or whatever. The DLC they announced is not substantial enough. A Hard Mode? Some apologists are claiming that Hero Mode will be in the retail-release. I have never heard Nintendo say that. As far we know, the Hard Mode in the DLC will be Hero Mode.

I think it's a waste of time and resources. Nintendo, please go take a vacation, or work on the next game instead of dwelling on Breath of Wild.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Retrotek SCART to Component Converter" Review (SCBV1P3)

Image
I do not like spreading negativity out there, but I needed to warn people about this device. I bought this for 80 dollars on ebay; I'm not gonna link from whom, because he or she does not deserve more sales of this awful device. When it works, it works, albeit with flaws. The image produced is sharp, as a component-video signal should be, and the colors are accurate, except that there is a green tint to the entire picture. I've read that one has to open these things up and adjust the 'pots' inside (an electrical term) with a screwdriver. I never really tried doing that or minded the green tint too much, because it's very subtle. What I did mind a lot, was the fact that sometimes, it won't work, and I'll only get audio. This is a big problem. I wouldn't mind the colors being a little off, or there being some 'noise' in the video-signal, but when the success-rate of the thing actually working is 50%, it's a deal-breaker. I paid 80 dolla...
Read more

White Japanese Sega Saturn 3D Control Pad (Controller) Review HSS-0137

Image
As a recently new Sega Saturn owner, I knew I had to get the Sega Saturn 3D Control Pad because it was the definitive controller for playing Nights Into Dreams. I decided to purchase the more aesthetically-pleasing Japanese version. Upon first inspection, it is noticeably big - bigger than it should be. Sega was probably going for form over function here, because the round shape does look like a mini-spaceship or UFO, which goes with their theme of space with the Saturn itself, but it is not the most ergonomically comfortable controller out there. For example, when playing six-button fighting-games, it is difficult to hold the controller in the left hand and 'piano' the buttons with the right. The d-pad is a little different from the American Model 1 and Japanese Model 2 controllers'. It feels a little stiffer. Of the three controllers I have tried, it has my least favorite d-pad. On the plus-side, however, it features the best start-button of the three. ...
Read more

Japanese Model 2 Sega Saturn Controller Review HSS-0101

Image
Recently, I bought a Model 2 American Sega Saturn, but it came with a Model 1 controller. It was pretty good, but I liked the look of the Model 2 Japanese controller, and the d-pad seemed more comfortable. After ordering one on ebay, and opening the package I later received, I was taken aback at how 'creamy' the controller looked. It didn't look like it had changed color, like old NESes, but it didn't look as white as I had imagined. Even the photo above looks whiter than it actually is. The d-pad is better than the Model 1's, but not by too much. The face-buttons feel the same, but the Start-button is a big improvement. The biggest improvement comes in the form of the shoulder-buttons. I don't think the actual internal switches have changed, but now you don't have to press the buttons on the rear of its plastic-shell to get them to actuate. In general, they feel and sound like mouse-buttons. You won't want to use them in action-games, but f...
Read more